
Contact
Steve Roberts, LLC
NO PRESSURE. SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY. NO HIDDEN FEES.
"*" indicates required fields
When a boulder or rockslide causes a car accident in De Beque Canyon on I-70 near Grand Junction, the drivers may not be solely responsible. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) might share some of the responsibility. Under C.R.S. 24-10-106, individuals can file injury claims against the state due to dangerous road conditions. The exception applies when the state knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to address it.
But if you’re going to file a claim in Colorado, you’ll need to pay close attention to deadlines, including the 182-day window to submit written notice of the injury. Contact us for help with your De Beque Canyon injury claim by calling 720-515-7058.
Colorado’s I-70 has some dangerous stretches, especially during inclement weather. Steep grades create their own risks, with big trucks suffering brake failures on the descents from the Eisenhower Tunnel and carriers violating posted chain requirements on Vail Pass. Hazmat trucks have to take Loveland Pass to get around the tunnel, and the steep mountain switchbacks can be an issue.
De Beque Canyon drivers face a different set of risks. The interstate runs through a narrow gorge that features a steep, fractured rock wall alongside the road. When loose rock breaks free from that wall, it falls without warning. That’s an important distinction. When rockfalls cause an accident, they bring government responsibility into the mix.
Major rockfalls in De Beque Canyon, including fallen boulders that are several feet wide, occasionally close roadways while crews remove debris. But minor rockfalls happen often, especially during spring thaw and after heavy rainfall events. Mitigation projects are ongoing, but the canyon has a variety of conditions that combine to make rockfalls especially dangerous:
The history of rockfalls on I-70 can help with injury claims. When a hazard occurs repeatedly in the same area, the agency has a tougher time proving it wasn’t aware of the risk.
Typically, liability in a highway collision relies on driver negligence. One or more drivers may have been speeding or distracted, leading to a collision. But with a rockfall, the liability question can turn to the agency responsible for maintaining that road. Did that agency properly manage risk?
In Colorado, state agencies like CDOT are usually granted immunity from lawsuits. That protection comes from the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (CGIA), but it lists some very specific exceptions.
One exception refers to injuries that are caused by a dangerous road condition that “physically interferes with the movement of traffic on the paved portion” of the road. If a boulder is in the middle of a travel lane or rock debris covers the roadway, that may fit the conditions listed in the law.
That exception to the law doesn’t mean you have a slam-dunk case against the state. You’ll usually need to show:
How a road was maintained also factors into rockfall liability claims. The CGIA doesn’t label a roadway’s condition as dangerous simply because the design of that road causes accidents. That’s why rockfall claims tend to focus on road maintenance rather than how the road was designed. Questions may include:
Legal cases often focus heavily on that gap between how a road was designed and how it was maintained prior to the crash. Courts address that by reviewing inspection records and maintenance logs, as well as looking at the history of similar incidents in that area.
If you’re making a claim against a government agency in Colorado, you’ll need to understand how the rules differ from typical injury cases. With a government-related injury claim, you’ll have only 182 days to file a written notice. Miss that deadline, and your claim may be barred regardless of how sound your case is. If you sue a private driver or trucking company, you won’t face such a strict deadline.
C.R.S. 24-10-114 caps the damages you can receive from a Colorado government agency, and those caps are adjusted for inflation. The limitations can fall well below your costs, but in some cases, we can recover damages from other involved parties.
Even if a boulder falls and disrupts traffic, drivers can still bear some or all of the responsibility for an accident. Someone may have been driving too fast for the current road conditions, following another vehicle too closely, or not adhering to posted instructions.
C.R.S. 13-21-111 allows responsibility to be split among multiple parties, and the government can be among those parties. The state’s liability for road hazards doesn’t eliminate the driver’s responsibility. It simply gives injured parties legal options if government negligence led to a crash.
Evidence that a rockfall caused your crash can vanish quickly. Crews will remove debris as fast as they can to keep traffic moving. That means the rock’s size and exact position may not be around a few hours later. For best results, make sure you do the following after a crash:
You won’t be able to access some of the most important records, including closure history and maintenance schedules. You’ll need to request those through official channels. An attorney can help expedite that process, gathering the information while it’s still available.
A rockfall accident in De Beque Canyon could involve multiple responsible parties with legal processes applying to each. A claim against the state comes with firm deadlines and limits on damages, but a claim against a driver or trucking company is held to separate standards.
If falling rock was involved in your crash on I-70 through De Beque Canyon, don’t wait. Discover how a Denver truck accident attorney can help with your case by calling 720-515-7058 for a consultation.
NO PRESSURE. SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY. NO HIDDEN FEES.
"*" indicates required fields

NO PRESSURE. SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY. NO HIDDEN FEES.
"*" indicates required fields